All projects

Embedded systems

Industrial automation

Battery systems and manufacturing automation

3ME Technology

2 months to 3 days

A connected test and automation system that moved battery manufacturing from a slow, specialist-led process to a repeatable production workflow.

01

The system problem

Challenge

Battery-management hardware needed to be configured, exercised and verified across a growing product line. The existing process depended on manual intervention, fragmented tooling and long feedback loops between engineering and production.

Our responsibility

SSH Tech owned the technical path from the battery-management interface through to operator tooling: understanding the electrical and CAN behaviours, designing the test sequence, implementing embedded and desktop software, and making the workflow usable on the manufacturing floor.

How we approached it

  • Mapped the production sequence, device states and failure conditions before selecting the automation boundary.

  • Built deterministic test routines around the BMS and CAN interfaces so results could be reproduced and diagnosed.

  • Connected low-level device communication to operator-facing controls, logs and pass/fail evidence.

  • Iterated with manufacturing users so the tooling matched the actual assembly and commissioning workflow.

02

What we delivered

01

Instrument the battery system

Created reliable access to the BMS state and the signals needed to configure and validate each unit.

  • Embedded C++ interfaces for device communication
  • CAN message handling and state verification
  • Repeatable setup and diagnostic routines

02

Turn engineering steps into a workflow

Converted specialist knowledge into sequenced tooling that guided operators through setup, test and exception handling.

  • Automated test orchestration
  • Operator feedback and actionable failure states
  • Structured test records for traceability

03

Harden it for manufacturing

Refined the system around real production constraints so it could support throughput rather than remain a lab prototype.

  • Production-floor validation
  • Recovery paths for incomplete or failed runs
  • Handover of maintainable tools and technical knowledge

03

Outcomes and evidence

2 months → 3 days

Manufacturing cycle

The end-to-end cycle was reduced from roughly two months to three days.

AU$4M+

Sales supported

The embedded work supported more than AU$4M in product sales.

Technical stack

Embedded C++

CAN

BMS interfaces

Test automation

Operator tooling

Capabilities applied

System integration

Manufacturing tooling

Embedded software

Verification

Continue exploring

Control-system reverse engineering

A contract-defining prototype